Shadow Divers is a book that has been rattling around in my
brain, but I haven’t known how to post on it until watching The Magnificent
Seven last night with the reluctant wife.
The new Magnificent Seven has received lukewarm reviews, she wasn’t up
for watching Kurosawa’s Seven Samurai (the original film) and neither of us had
seen John Sturges’ 1960 remake of it as a western. Coincidentally a friend is considering trying
to interest his son in classic westerns after having seen the new version, and
I was curious about how well that genre and this version have stood up.
The Magnificent Seven is a story written by men for men
about being a man’s man. The men in this
movie are bad men. They are gunmen who
have done bad things to people. When
they have their first scene, Yul Brynner as Chris and Steve McQueen as Vin
stand up for the Indian who has been killed on the streets of a shabby border
time by driving his hearse through gunfire to boot hill where he will be buried
next to the white people who want to lie in eternity only with their own. Chris and Vin’s motives are unclear – perhaps
it is the adventure, or perhaps it is the chance to stick it to the racist
snobs who are the civilizing force that has run them as gunmen out of business
all over the west. But the Mexican
villagers who have come to the border town seeking help see them as a
combination of Robin Hood and Knights in Shining Armor and put up all of their
money to hire them and a five friends (at a pittance compared to what they
usually command) to protect them from Calvera (played by Eli Wallach) and his
forty men who regularly take the peasants’ hard won grain just because he has
guns and can do that.
Shadow Divers (published in 2004) is a non-fiction book with
three central characters – two scuba divers and the author – a sort of shadow
diver of a different variety. The scuba
divers both dive wrecks off the Jersey shore – a sort of quasi-legal pillaging
and pirating of stuff – plates and silverware and the captain’s bell from a
variety of ships – the big prize of which is the Andrea Doria – an ocean liner
buried in 200 feet of water that is extremely dangerous to enter and navigate
inside of. But there is a huge
difference between them. John Chatterton
appears to be the principled diver – one who always goes through proper
protocol and is held up as a diver’s diver – and Ritchie Kohler – a diver who
goes along with bawdy and ribald divers on alcohol infused party dives whose
goal is to accumulate the most loot possible.
They become part of a group that discovers a here-to-fore unknown wreck –
a wreck of a U-boat – that is in very deep water – at the limits of what they
can reach – with a mystery – which U-boat is it? Robert Kurson – the author of the book –
tells a gripping story of the dives and research done to determine the identity
of the boat – but he also dives into the lives of these two men and tells a man’s
story written to appeal (I think) to men about what it means to be a man.
Now, reluctant or not, I am a psychoanalyst, and I want some
depth to stories that I read and to movies that I see. I want to know the back stories and the
internal experience of the protagonists.
I want to resonate with the characters as portrayed. Both of these stories pretend to offer that –
but I think that both of them do so in a highly coded fashion. And I think the code is one that is intended
to hide rather than reveal what it is that men experience. I don’t mean this maliciously. I think it is what men – at least men in our
culture do – or believe they need to do – not just to survive, though I think
both of these are cast as survival tales and I think we are drawn to them
because of that, but to thrive – to create a story that turns their tawdriness
and loneliness and isolation into something grander – something enviable and
worthy of emulation.
The Magnificent Seven is almost self-conscious and
transparent about laying out what I have outlined in the last paragraph. There is a piece of dialogue, when the
assembled group is contemplating why they are doing what they are doing and
they are engaged in a conversation with the last member, Chico (Horst Bucholz), who is a
wannabe gunslinger – not the real thing like the rest of them. It goes like this:
Chico: Villages like this they
make up a song about every big thing that happens. Sing them for years.
Chris Adams: You think it's worth
it?
Chico: Don't you?
Chris Adams: It's only a matter
of knowing how to shoot a gun. Nothing big about that.
Chico: Hey. How can you talk like
this? Your gun has got you everything you have. Isn't that true? Hmm? Well,
isn't that true?
Vin: Yeah, sure. Everything.
After a while you can call bartenders and faro dealers by their first name -
maybe two hundred of 'em! Rented rooms you live in - five hundred! Meals you
eat in hash houses - a thousand! Home - none! Wife - none! Kids... none!
Prospects - zero. Suppose I left anything out?
Chris Adams: Yeah. Places you're
tied down to - none. People with a hold on you - none. Men you step aside for - none.
Lee: Insults swallowed - none.
Enemies - none.
Chris Adams: No enemies?
Lee: Alive.
Chico: Well. This is the kind of
arithmetic I like.
Chris Adams: Yeah. So did I - at
your age.
The real gunslingers have been at this for a while. They have a talent. It is using a particular machine with
particular skill. They are at the height
of their powers, but they are no longer wanted.
They have drifted south because there is no longer real work for them
and the law is civilizing the west. This
job – one that they would have been well paid in the past – is one that they
are receiving twenty dollars for six weeks work – and they are working for
principle – for what is right. They live
by the code: “Men you step aside for – none,” and they are helping other men
not step aside – teaching them how to fight, not just fighting on their
behalf.
Some of the gunslingers are haunted by demons – and they all
acknowledge, in one way or another, the fear that they have before a fight –
that this life – despite their really cool guns and really cool leather
holsters and their really cool demeanors – is a dangerous one. More than that, the glamour that comes from
the danger is artificial. In fact, they
find themselves envious of the peasants they have come to protect. These people have a life that will fight to
defend – not because they are paid to do it, but because they love their family
and community and the community and their families love them.
Shadow Divers is much less self-aware – I think that Robert
Kurson, the author, is too caught up in his own hero worship – or in convincing
us that we should worship the heroes that he creates – to notice the cracks and
crevices in the marble sculptures he creates.
John Chatterton, the first hero Kurson serves up, is the son
of an alcoholic Yale graduate who runs out on his family before inventing the Bar-O-Matic,
the ubiquitous dispenser of a variety of sodas through a single hose. Unsupported by his father, Chatterton serves
a one year tour of duty in Vietnam as a medic and his actions are heroic. He is a thoughtful diver – one who works
through the details of how to get to a particular point within a boat over the
course of many dives and scholarship about the architecture of it. He is meticulous with his materials and is
cautious in his approach – while also confronting tremendous danger. He, like the gunslingers, knows his tools and
how to use them. He also thinks through
the implications of the U-boat dive as one that is necessarily one that involves
a gravesite and he makes a plan ahead of time for respecting the bodies of
those he finds.
Ritchie Kohler, the second hero, also has an interesting
history with his father; the difference is that he has a real relationship with
him, in fact he idolized him. His father
taught him about boats, fishing, and to value his German heritage – to be proud
of it. He also told Ritchie about the
many wrecks that they fished that were caused by German U-boats. Their later relationship proved much more difficult
as Ritchie failed to live up to the harsh and critical expectations of his
father when they worked together in the father’s business and Ritchie ultimately
left the business with considerable hard feelings. Kohler is also the one who is taken by
surprise by the bodies that he discovers in the boat – and has to wrestle – in the
deep with his mind reeling from the toxic mix of nitrogen in the bloodstream
with what to do about the people’s remains he confronts.
The issue I have with Kurson, the author of Shadow Divers,
is that, despite protestations to the contrary, he takes the formative
narratives at face value. Told almost as
succinctly as I have outlined them above, they are tied into the heroes later
lives as explanatory of them as heroes, while their obvious shortcomings –
Chatterton marries and parts from a woman who is caught up in her own
obsessions while Kohler has a series of failed relationships – are glossed over
and the ways in which they may have turned to dangerous and glory filled
avocations may grow not just out of Chatterton’s self-written guides to life
and Kohler’s learning about boats and the sea at an early age, but out of a
need to accomplish something in their own eyes that they weren’t able to in
others. In fact, they may have turned,
as the gunmen may have turned, to mastering materials rather than people
because they found that they could rely on materials to be worked in ways that
would benefit them.
Now, to be fair, neither the book (nor the movie for that
matter) is intended to be about the characters of the heroes – but about their
exploits. And I think we read it to
learn about the exploits. As short and
undigested as the biographical information is, the material about diving and
the experience of diving is long and we learn about particular dives in minute
detail (and the fight scenes in The Magnificent Seven are rendered in
magnificent detail). We are being
encouraged to listen to the song the villagers sing about the heroes who found
the wreck, and not to look at the arithmetic of loneliness that leads them to
be poking around in the ocean trying to discover something interesting about
the past.
That said, the characters of the two men will out. At the end of the book, it is Kohler who
connects with the families of the crew members – who takes, at their request,
trinkets from the ship to them so that they can have something concrete to
remember their family members by. Even
more, he seems to truly enjoy hearing the stories and finding out about the
individuals aboard the boat – though that is also a tribute to Kurson, who
humanizes people who might have been villainized for being part of a corrupt
war machine that engaged in atrocities.
The magnificent seven, as much as they argue against their
path – so much so that Chico, the wannabe who likes the math in the middle,
ends up choosing to stay in the village and become the farmer he truly is – and
to marry the woman he has become sweet on – or she on him – also exude the aura
of “be like me.” The hero encourages us
to identify with his or her accomplishments – to become the person that they are. And we strongly desire doing that. And their drive to be heroes leaves us with
much that we would not otherwise have.
Kohler touches the lives of Germans who had long given up knowing what
became of loved ones – and Chatterton goes on, with Kohler sometimes in tow, to
explore great wrecks all over the world – including the Titanic.
Vin and Chris ride off into the sunset after ridding the
town of the feared Calvera. They have
righted a small wrong. Kohler and
Chatterton set something straight about history – the U-boat they discovered
was not sunk off Gibraltar as the record of the war maintained, but off New
Jersey. It was not involved in a great
naval battle and may not have caused any of the wrecks that Ritchie’s father
told him about – we do not know. Yet the
actual settling of the west was (ironically) dependent on little known or
documented moments when civilizing forces like these gunslingers engaged in –
and the second world war was not just a war of great military pushes – the battle
of the bulge – but of frantic moments for thousands – maybe millions of men and
women – many of those moments ending in death.
Both of these are stories of men who risked their lives to
set something right – to fix something in the world that was amiss. The Magnificent Seven acknowledges that this
was at least as much about putting something to rights within the individual
psyches of the misfits who banded together to save the town, while Kurson, at
best, hints at that. I think that a tale
told without acknowledging the costs of heroism – the ways in which it is not
just based on noble motives, but also on base or human or complicated ones that
get twisted into acts that are noble – sometimes despite their motives – are more
difficult to craft and more difficult to listen to. My family has recoiled from my attempts to
engage them in watching Das Boot, a German film with subtitles about what it is
like to live beneath the sea, stating that my tastes in movies are too esoteric
and difficult. What about a good story
well told?
OK. I liked the
Magnificent Seven. It was a tale well
told. OK. I had a hard time putting Shadow Divers
down. But I want something more from
them – especially the second; I want to know that the cracks I see are part of
what the heroes are working to plaster over – and I want a narrator who helps
us see that and who trusts us to love a flawed hero – in fact, to find a hero’s
flaws a compelling part of the narrative.
To access a narrative description of other posts on this site, link here. For a subject based index, link here.
To subscribe to posts (which occur 2-3 times per month), if you are on a computer, hit the X button on the upper right of this screen and, on the subsequent screen, hover your cursor over the black line in the upper right area and choose the pop out box that says subscribe and then enter the information. I'm sorry but I don't currently know how you can subscribe from a mobile device - hopefully you have a computer as well...
No comments:
Post a Comment