Dust bowl is both a term that is part of my professional
vocabulary and one I grew up with. I
live in a fly over state. It is in the Midwest,
but I like to think of it as the true Midwest while the Plains States are the other
Midwest. The Dust Bowl happened in the
other Midwest – as what I think of as the drive through states – Eastern Colorado, Western Nebraska and Kansas, and the panhandles of Oklahoma and Texas. States that it takes forever to get across
when you are headed to your destination - the mountains. States that are flat and boring. Our Midwest, the one east of the Mississippi
river, is one that used to have the Big Ten Schools firmly in it (while the
plains states had the Big Twelve), but those conferences are now all muddled, and,
frankly, psychology has always muddled them.
The psychology departments in both conferences are in huge land grant
institutions with huge enrollments and huge available undergraduate populations
to engage in psychological experimentation on, and they have long been bundled
together as Dust Bowl Psychology Departments – distinct from the departments on
the coasts (and, truth be told, some in their midst) that have more
traditionally been involved in psychoanalytic and humanistic psychology – the
dust bowl psychologists have focused on the average person by looking at the
herd, not, as in the other camp, on the individual.
Statistical analysis is at the heart of dust bowl psychology
– and the statistics come from: agriculture.
The land grant institutions were places where farmer’s sons (and
daughters) went to study how to grow better crops. They planted those crops in plots and
determined whether this plot or that plot grow better with statistical tools
like ANOVA and its split plot function. We lifted that methodology to see whether this or that psychological treatment had a better outcome (as if treating clients is a bit like growing healthy crops).
Timothy Egan's The Worst Hard Time –
a book about the actual dust bowl itself – is a brutal book. It is about the people who are similar to J.
D. Vance’s Hillbillies in his Hillbilly Elegy – a group of Scots-Irish descent –
the other WASPS – the ones who came here not as landowners, but as indentured
servants. The ones who Ta-Nehisi Coates
equated with the first slaves but who, slowly, over time, came to see
themselves as poor but better than the blacks.
And it is this group of “whites” – along with other groups of “whites”
(as if white were a culture or an ethnicity or a race that had some kind of
integrity) - that were a significant group in propelling Trump into the Presidency (and the characters in this book are white and overtly racist - against both blacks but also, to a lesser extent, native Americans).
So, I read this book with curiosity. Who are these people who live among us and
think so differently from the way that I do?
Who are these people who are so susceptible to the populist rhetoric
that Trump preached and who are an important component of the people inside of
the coalition that elected him? This
book portrays them as a wide ranging group of people who have in common grit – well-earned
grit.
I also read this book with interest because I grew up with the
dust bowl as a symbol, and sometimes it felt like the causal agent (though this book makes clear it was not - though it certainly contributed to it), of the
Great Depression. It spawned John
Steinbeck’s Okies, travelling west to California in broken down cars to escape
it in the Grapes of Wrath. It was symbolic
of a time when my parents were young and stuff was hard to come by. My Mom’s parents had to sell their own car to be
able to pay the hospital bill in order to take my Mom home after she was
born. But this book is not primarily
about those at a distance – the Okies who left or people like my Mom (though it
does mention someone who, like my Mom’s family, was in Chicago, who sold their
child to pay a hospital bill – I guess it could have been worse). This book is about those who lived in the
Dust Bowl. The ones who stuck with the
land that was literally disappearing from beneath their feet and showering down
on their heads from above.
The author is writing history – and he chooses five or six
characters to follow through the dust bowl.
Here he is at a disadvantage to the novelist. As Irv Yalom pointed out in the introduction
to his classic (West Coast Psychology) book on Existential Psychotherapy (p.21), when
the historian writes about Queen Elizabeth, she, upon reading the book will
say, “I still have my secret.” His point
is that the novelist is able to imagine him or herself into a character with abandon
– they are able to infuse the character with their own human essence – in a way
that the historian, constrained by facts, cannot. We are told about characters in this book,
but we don’t actually get to know them.
So the vehicle for psychoanalytic understanding is not vicarious – it ends
up being much more direct than that.
What we get instead of the phenomenology of the characters
in the story, partly by hearing the stories of those characters, but mostly by
dint of fact and description, is a more direct experience – I would almost say
the lived experience – of being attacked by the land we are living on. We become the agents of the phenomenology of living in the dust bowl as we
live through the dust storms and their impact as described in vivid detail. And these are not trifling storms. They infiltrate the best insulated
homes. They occur 14, 16, 18 times a
month, sometimes for 15 days in a row.
They fill our mouths, our ears, our eyes with dust. Because there is so much stuff rubbing against itself in the air, there is static electricity everywhere there is a conductor - it shorts out our cars - it knocks us down when we touch each other - and it sparks across the barbed wire in the fields. Some of us go blind from the dirt that is
ground between eye and eyelid. Many of
us, especially the young and the old, after three years of this, get “dust
pneumonia”, something that is akin to coal miner’s black lung disease – but it
comes much faster. We wear masks and we
put Vaseline on our noses, and still the dust gets into our lungs. The clouds rain dirt. When there is a little water mixed in, they
rain mud. We live in dug outs, carved in
the ground, alive with centipedes and spiders.
And our roofs, which shed the dirt, let the dust seep through to build
up above our ceilings so that our ceilings sag and we have to drill a hole to
let the mounds of dust come into a bucket to be collected and carried
outside. And every year, year after
year, it gets worse. Occasionally there
is a big storm – one that dumps twelve million tons of soil on Chicago and
blankets New York and Washington in brown and that even rains dirt on ships
hundreds of miles out at sea – but for us – this stuff coming from the sky is a
daily occurrence.
Why did we subject ourselves to this? We were drawn here by a variety of
factors. Some of us are ranchers or
cowboys who ran the Indians and buffalo off the prairie to herd cattle. Some of us followed and plowed up the land to
plant wheat – something that worked well in the wet years and we became rich,
so others followed us. And they came
with something new – gas powered plows that could plow up more land than anyone
had ever thought possible. We could
homestead. We could get land for free,
just by agreeing to work it – to plow it up and plant it – something that we
had done elsewhere as sharecroppers.
Here we did it as landowners. We
were now part of the American dream – we were no longer supporters of the
lifestyles of the rich – we now owned a piece of the action. And we built towns and we carried around a 100
dollar bill in our hand just to let people know just how rich we were.
But our enthusiasm laid bare land that had been protected by
the drought resistant buffalo grass – and drought here is not a rare
phenomenon. Half or so of the years there
is not enough rainfall to support crops so those are considered drought years. And those years tend to come in batches. This land would be desert without the grass –
and it quickly became that when the rains stopped. The topsoil was blown away now that it was
uncovered, and it was replace by dust – sand – that heaped itself into
dunes. There is now nothing living –
nothing green – to be seen for miles and miles.
Horses are gnawing at fence posts to try to get some nutrition. We have wells that support small patches of
vegetables, but these can be quickly covered by a sandstorm and our homes –
even if we have gotten rich enough to have a frame house – become windbreaks
that allow the sand to pile up against the sides – we have climb out a window to shovel a path to
our front door to unblock it. And it is
the wind – the ever present wind – and the clouds of dust – that are enough to
drive a person mad.
In the midst of reading this book, I began to fear the nice
comfortable Midwestern rain clouds that would roll in. Would they release clean rain or would they
rain mud? Nature suddenly became
harsh. This experience reflects the book, where nature's danger was
unrelenting. When Roosevelt’s man Hugh Bennett
finally got the farmers to start contour plowing (not, as in this part of the Midwest,
to follow the contours of the land – but there, in the other Midwest – to be at
right angles to the prevailing winds), and, when just a little rain did come
and just a sprig of green came up – the grasshoppers descended on the green and
destroyed it – ate it in a heartbeat. No
longer constrained by the snakes and the birds – the snakes dead, the birds staying
away from the now vast desert in the middle of the country – the grasshoppers
had a field day. Just when we thought there was hope, those hopes were dashed. Recovery from this
condition was slow and, at least in Egan’s mind, never complete.
When I was a Junior in college in Santa Fe, a friend and I
decided to strap some tents on our bikes and ride home to Ohio for the
summer. We rode out of Santa Fe and south,
around the mountains and then went diagonally northwest across the upper corner
of New Mexico crossing the tip of the panhandle of Oklahoma into Western
Kansas. Santa Fe is high desert as are
the mountains in New Mexico, but as we approached the flatlands of Oklahoma and
Kansas the land got greener.
It was late spring as we started – the last light snow fell
the day we started out. My memories of
the trip were some of the most vivid of my life. The combination of being outside all day – having
the feel of the road along with the sights and smells led to a fuller
experience than I had before or since. I remembered more detail of those three
weeks than I have ever had. But then, a
few months later, we developed the pictures we took, and I could feel those
memories collapsing and attaching themselves to the images – limiting themselves
to what was in the picture book. It is
hard to reconstruct – and it was early enough in spring that crops would have
all looked pretty much alike, but I think that by the time we hit Oklahoma a
lot of what was on either side of us was grassland.
Western Kansas was a series of rides from one grain elevator
– in a tiny town with a gas station and 10 or 20 houses – to the next grain
elevator that appeared on the horizon – with its gas station and houses. We stopped in each town for some water or a
meal (we would buy food at the local grocery or convenience store) and to put
some air in my tires – they had a bunch of slow leaks and there wasn’t a
European inner tube to be had in Western Kansas – and we answered the same
questions – Where are you going? Where
did you come from? How many miles do
make in a day? The people were very
pleasant. One carful of kids handed us
each a Coors light – which tasted pretty awful warm on a hot day while riding a
bike, but the thought was in the right place.
The wind was our constant companion and scourge. I naively thought that the prevailing winds
would push us across the land. Most of the
time they were in our face and it was really hard to make headway. One day the wind blew from the south and,
rather than leaning at 45 degrees into it as we pedaled east, we simply turned north and let it push us. We rode 125 miles that day and barely pedaled – we just sat high in our seats and became sails that propelled
us.
Egan maintains, and I don’t doubt him, that much of the
green we were seeing around us was a mirage.
The wheat is now supported by deep wells that go down to the Ogallala
aquifer, a huge underground lake left by the last retreating glaciers. The problem is this water is not being
replenished. It is being used at the
rate of more than one million acre feet per year – and it is a nonrenewable
resource. Ultimately Bennett was able to
save the plains from becoming a Saharan desert through conservation techniques –
and a social system where everybody looked after everybody else’s planting
habits. Egan maintains that the soil conservation
districts are the only grassroots portion of the New Deal that is still functioning. The Ogallala aquifer helps to maintain the
illusion of a sustainable crop agriculture system in a climate that is too dry
to support it, and Egan believes that this is another ecological disaster
waiting to happen.
Years after our bike trip, I was driving across western
Kansas on a road trip to the mountains and there was a stretch of the
interstate that was closed so we were shunted onto a US highway that paralleled
it. Every pickup truck driver that passed
us acknowledged up by unwrapping his (or occasionally her) finger tips from the
steering while to hold up their flat palm – the hand never left the steering
wheel. And I quickly began returning the
salute. In this country we are all in it
together was the feeling I had, even before reading this book. Now I have a better sense of what that is
about.
There are no deep analyses of character in this book – there
are plenty of characters, but we really don’t get a sense of why the men who
joined the “Last Man Club” did that – vowing never to leave no matter how bad
it got. And we can’t blame some of those
who left despite that pledge. There was a kind of grim
fatalism to just finishing the book. It
was cruel and unusual punishment that the story just kept getting worse, it
didn’t get better and the bit about the desert being saved came way late and
didn’t feel all that hopeful.
I think we are encouraged by this book to imagine the lives
of these people – the deprivation they survived to hang onto land that was
their own. And when we begin to wrap our
minds around this, we can begin to imagine that there is an attachment to that
land that is as powerful as the attachment of a child to an abusive parent - and
there is also an attachment to the dream of what that land can bring. Both of these are attachments that are deeply felt by those who have chosen to stay.
I think there is also a deeply felt sense of tribalism – of kinsmanship
between these white people – people who generally have no shared roots save
those that extend into the land – and a sense of “we-ness” that is very
territorial (there is one ethnically homogenous group of farmers – Volga Germans
who had migrated to Russia under Catherine the Great's largesse and were no
longer welcome there - who brought the seeds of the red winter wheat that can
survive on less water – and the tumbleweeds that survived in the desert that
the wheat left behind when the water got too scarce even for it - did I mention that people ground up tumbleweeds to feed to their horses and cattle?).
We may be generations removed from the worst hard time, but
some things endure. These people have
banded together to survive a desert and then rebuild a grassland and “America’s
breadbasket” – a swath of land that has been called on before and after the dust bowl to feed
the world. The attachment between the
people and the land becomes as palpable as any other attachment that is
primal. A populist – someone who can
articulate that attachment – who can call forth our patriot vigor - as well as the
feeling of threat that something foreign might take it away – as the wind has done before –
can awaken in these people a powerful sense that we need to band together to
ward off an external evil. We people of the plains, we who have survived
so much, must prevent the next hard time from happening.
Maybe it is no accident that "herd" psychology - Dust Bowl Psychology - has happened in the middle of the country - the various midwestern states that have gone red in our last election. There may be an illusion of homogeneity that we prize here - the sense that it is us against nature - and the us is a group that looks like us - even if we don't have much in common beyond how we look and that we feel that we are fighting for our survival in a vast space that can both support and vanquish us. That said, the experience of the dust bowlers parallels, in an eerie fashion, those who chased whales in the Atlantic, until they had hunted them to exhaustion, and then chased them into the Pacific. In the Heart of the Sea - the story of those hunters - is also a brutal read about people who live close to nature and have to fight to survive when nature turns on them.
To subscribe to posts (which occur 2-3 times per month), if you are on a computer, hit the X button on the upper right of this screen and, on the subsequent screen, hover your cursor over the black line in the upper right area and choose the pop out box that says subscribe and then enter the information. I'm sorry but I don't currently know how you can subscribe from a mobile device - hopefully you have a computer as well...
No comments:
Post a Comment