The central problem this film tries to solve is also the central problem
with the film. Our Hero, Luke Skywalker, the young, brash
and impetuous fighter for all that is right and good, has grown old and bitter and withdrawn from the
galaxy. When Ray, the next generation
force gifted woman hungry for training tracks him down and shows up on his
doorstep – the final scene in the last film – Luke has no interest in her and
no interest in training her in the first scene in this film - and his refusal is hardly believable. What
happened? Well, the movie explains the
steps that led to this point, but the more central question is, what has
happened to Luke the character and Mark Hamill the actor? The answer within the movie is provided by Ray; Luke has closed
himself off to the force. As for Mark Hamill, playing an old curmudgeon seems to no longer allow the force to be with him either. The flatness of a forceless central character
felt to me, as I watched the film, to be a central flaw of the film. After a few days of letting the film baste,
and also having a dream this morning that was, I think, stirred by the film, I
am willing to think of this flaw as a way into what may be the central
compelling aspect of the film.
One part of the issue is the question of the force
itself. Like the manifold gadgets that
the characters use in each film that are not explained but just part of the
background, the force is a religion that is a creation of Lucas and we receive
hints about aspects of it, but we are never catechized. The Jedi are, apparently, the high priests of
this religion – and they have been all but driven out of the universe – we are,
as the title suggests, down to just one.
And this religion, like the religions of old, allows the practitioner to
perform miracles – though Luke pooh-poohs the lifting of rocks as a central
aspect of the religion, it certainly comes in handy in other films and in the
resolution of this one. This religion
is, like all religions, powerful. And a
little power gives the illusion of great, vast, even infinite power. And this can be heady stuff. One would think it would be the stuff of the
dark side, and I’m sure it is, but it is also the stuff of the other dark side,
if you will, those who stand by, as Luke is doing, and do nothing, because as powerful as the force is, it can't seem to make the world behave the way that we want it to. Because when a little power doesn’t turn out
to be absolute, it can be disillusioning and we can take our ball and go home
if we don’t get to be the winner – the one with absolute power and absolute
knowledge.
One of the things that drew me to the field of psychology
generally was the power that I experienced in the hands of the practitioners
who treated me when I was an adolescent.
They were able to intervene helpfully in my personal and in my family
life. When it came time, however, to
become a therapist myself – when I went off to graduate school – I was aware of
leaving out power as a motivating factor for going into this field. That is, I think, telling. We don’t want to acknowledge how important power
is to us – and when we deny that (which I was doing publicly – but very aware
of privately) we can get into all kinds of problems.
The Jedi are, in the Star Wars movies, fighting against the
dark side of the force – the side of the force where the naked desire for power
leads to corruption and the creation of an evil empire run by those who are
enslaved by the dark side and all that it promises. This is a very American viewpoint – we view
ourselves as liberators – as protectors of what is good in the world. We are the underdog (even when we were, for a
brief while, the sole superpower). The
forces of evil always outweigh the forces of the good. Or, the force of power is never strong
enough. We always need more. That is demonstrated in spades by the bad
guys – Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader in the early films – Ben Solo/Kylo Ren in
the Last Jedi, but also, I think, by Luke Skywalker, the best of the good guys.
No one has more power than Luke Skywalker. But, and this is a significant and fun moment
in The Last Jedi, this does not mean that he is impervious to making
errors. In fact, he is told by Yoda –
the true and original font of all things Jedi, that it is an essential part of being
a Jedi to make mistakes – and to learn from them. This lightness of being that Yoda personifies
– this sense that we do, in fact, have a great deal of power, but that the
universe, despite our power, is bigger and stronger and more complicated than
our power can master or than our genius can comprehend – and Yoda's ability to be
OK with that – is a very difficult to state to achieve. It is easier to feel powerless – to feel that
others have what we don’t have and to envy that and to try to acquire it.
As an aside, I think that one of the issues in the last US
presidential election was that Hillary was running as an outsider – as the
first woman candidate. She wasn’t
running as a Senator, a Secretary of State, and a First Lady – as among the
most powerful people in the country save the president. Her denial of her power – her denial of the
power that the democratic party has wielded to create a more inclusive country –
“No, we haven’t achieved all that we might, but we have, especially in the eyes
of others, come a long way, baby” – made her, I think, vulnerable to the fear
based position that Trump took – a position that led those with the most power
in the country, and many with the least – to feel that they were the
disempowered outside group – they saw this despite her not having said it. Had Hillary’s debate position been something
like, “We have made great strides and I am the frontrunner because I speak to
the concerns of most of the people – I am not trying to convince the people who
would vote for you to vote for me – I am trying to convince those of us who
have been in power to assert the importance of wielding that power for the good
things that we have done and will continue to do” perhaps there would have been
a different outcome. Who knows? Of course, I think Obama did say that on her behalf, but, apparently not enough people bought it.
Closer to home, I haven’t written a blog post in over a
month. I have achieved a number of
external goals that I have set for blogging – number of posts, number of hits –
but I have found some internal goals more elusive – articulating a cohesive
vision of what psychoanalysis is and how it helps to open up works of art and
the process of living to being more cogent.
I feel good about some posts – less so about others. It’s also true that I have also been simply
swamped by the end of semester grading and holiday planning, but I think there
is a part of me that is empathizing with Luke’s experience – if I can’t make it
all make sense, maybe I should just take my ball and go home. I also think that is a stage of life
issue. But I can’t imagine, living it,
that it would be much fun to portray it.
It is embarrassing to withdraw from something that you have been deeply
invested in. The hubris that it takes to
undertake something big – like becoming a Jedi or a psychoanalyst, and the
sense of pride about having achieved it can be overshadowed by how limited the
achievement is: not only does the world not bend to your will, but you are
bound and determined to NOT have it do that, but to use your power to help
others articulate themselves in ways that will empower them and ultimately be
for everyone’s good. As noble as that
sounds, it was frustrating when both the reluctant son and the reluctant
stepdaughter backed out of a day of skiing during this down time – both for legitimate
reasons, but both thwarting my vision of a “family day” that would be good for
all us – but is essentially something that I am most heartily invested in. Almost as frustrating as having Ben Solo, your nephew, appear to be toying with the Dark Side.
So, as I wrote about The Force Awakens, one measure of the
power of the universal themes articulated in the films of this series is that
they translate into the lived experience of our lives. We are just ordinary mortals – like Anakin, Luke
and then Ray – who are living on the periphery of the universe at the beginning
of our lives. Like them, we discover
that we have special talents and abilities.
We hope that they will be recognized and shaped, that we will be
mentored to become what we feel ourselves destined to be. Yoda was concerned about Luke, and this
applies to Anakin and now Ray, that he was not taken into training early enough
to prevent his becoming vulnerable to the dark side. Presumably Ben Solo, Han and Leia’s son, was
trained early enough, and by Luke. But –
and here it is, I think, ambiguous, Ben’s deep engagement with the dark side,
but also Luke’s discomfort with it – Ray demonstrates a curiosity about it – as
a place where she can learn more about her own heritage, but I think it is also
a place that is filled with a big chunk of all of our heritage and Luke’s
disavowal of that – his wish that the world could only be lightness and good,
or that all of his pupils would embrace the light side at the least, indicates
that he has not accepted the universe on its terms. I suppose it is hard for me to fault him for
that when I have failed to do that my own self.
To access a narrative description of other posts on this site, link here. For a subject based index, link here.
To subscribe to posts (which occur 2-3 times per month), if you are on a computer, hit the X button on the upper right of this screen and, on the subsequent screen, hover your cursor over the black line in the upper right area and choose the pop out box that says subscribe and then enter the information. I'm sorry but I don't currently know how you can subscribe from a mobile device - hopefully you have a computer as well...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteI just returned from a 12 hour walk with my old roommate from university times, somewhere in Central Europe. I have been doing a psychoanalyses the past 2,5 years. I realized we , after a long journey in academia, have (I am slowly) getting to a point t of having overcome many of the things that I had or have been dealing and struggling with. My old friend took a different path and actually works in the global south atm. Whenever we meet again we have long and interesting talks and I also realize how my way of listening and interacting have changed due to the psychoanalysis and my private interest in its theory. Sometimes I think I see things (or hints of his uncounciouss) when my old friend tells me about struggles etc, sometimes I would like to give him that „aha“ or „mhm“ that I’m used to from my personal experience, yet I know that I’m not a psychoanalyst and our relationship is structured in a completely different way, so I just sometimes openly say that out loud and instead of giving the „aha“ i try to say, what I think that might come out (and help him) if he would go on associating. But often that leads him to being very reluctant (for good reason) and responding that he will think about what I said. After out long talk I was thinking about how a psychoanalyst must feel sometimes and came to the same „Jedi analogy“ and randomly googled that question and analogy and came to ur post and enjoyed reading it. 🙏🏽 Thank you
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment! I think that you have articulated the difficulty that is part of being an analyst, but also part of being analyzed. There is a loneliness - and figuring out how to use that loneliness to offer connection - without forcing it - and to be strong enough to withstand the feelings that are aroused if and when the offer is rejected, is part of the difficult process of living... Hang in there! And enjoy your friendship.
ReplyDelete