Total Pageviews

Sunday, July 5, 2020

The Genius of Birds: Jennifer Ackerman Helps Us Understand How Minds Work.

Birds, Cognition, Psychology, Psychoanalysis, Climate Change, Social Responsibility

 

Birds, it turns out, are, collectively, incredibly smart critters.  They have skills and even problem solving abilities that approach human capacities in some surprising and some not so surprising ways.  As Jennifer Ackerman leads us into the research on bird cognition, we learn a great deal not just about how birds think but also about how minds work – even minds as different as bird and human.

 

As interested as I am in the mind, I don’t think I would have come across this book on my own.  I stayed at the home of a friend (also an analyst) and, in his guest bedroom, on the table next to the fold out couch that was actually quite comfortable to sleep in, was this little book.  It was also next to an old duck decoy.  Tired of the stuff I was supposed to be reading, I picked it up as it was either put there as a suggestion to a guest or something my host was in the middle of reading (the couch was in the room that was his office).  Though not a birder myself at all, I fell into reading it quite quickly and found the descriptions of birds and their attributes lively and entertaining, so I found a copy for myself and finished it at home, after the reluctant son borrowed it to read most of it before finishing it.  He, too, found it enthralling, but also didn’t feel the need to get to the end – and there isn’t any need to really – it is not a novel with an outcome, but a tale of capabilities well told.  That said, the ending pulls together the different attributes of the birds and talks about which species are likely to survive the next 100 years of global warming and which are not.  A stark and concerning reality is at hand.

 

Bird brains – boy doesn’t that call things to mind – turn out to be fascinating and not at all what that moniker would suggest.  They need to be much smaller than human brains because they need to be borne aloft – and birds (according to Ackerman) diverged from the line that would lead to humans so long ago that they are organized quite differently than mammal brains – which we usually compare our brains to.  That said, a quick google search of bird brain anatomy images leads to pictures of brains that are familiar – to a point.  Birds share with us the lizard brain – the deep brain structures that are responsible for things like breathing and heartbeat, as well as such basic animal functions as feelings.  They differ from us in the structures of the higher brain centers – the cerebral cortex.  The differences are structural (I can see this from the images) but also conceptual, in the ways that Ackerman talks about these brain centers getting specialized.

 

Diversity of cognitive capacity is talked about by Ackerman as occurring among different species of birds.  Those, for instance, who migrate over long distances have amazing internal maps as well as the ability to use the earth’s magnetic field, stars and sun positions, and olfactory cues to orient themselves.  Some species develop quite sophisticated aesthetic abilities.  The songbirds have, especially in some species, incredibly aural and oral capacities.  Humans, on the other hand, while we differ in our abilities in each of these areas, have brains that have considerable capacity in each of these areas.  We have, by virtue of being animals that don’t have to carry our brains into the air, bigger brains with a much broader range of capacities – across the board. 

 

This book is an argument for brain differences reflecting different capacities between bird species, but the abilities of those species together argues for the genius of the class – birds as a whole are not just smart, but have an amazing breadth of abilities.  Especially as we are in the process of articulating the ways in which institutional racism has been virulent in this country, it is important to make the distinction that the lack of true races allows.  For us, cultural diversity – the ability to program brains in a wide variety of ways, is what is relevant.  And we profit when those culturally diverse means of addressing issues can be brought together and used to engage in conversation.  But we have treated culture differences, at times, as an indication of hardwired ability.  We have concluded that the brains of one race, like the brains of a species, have particular aptitudes.  We have simplified the task of understanding the complexity of human cognition by dividing us into groups and then declaring that, like bird species, this group has these capabilities and that group has those.  In fact, within group differences are much greater than between group differences and we are, in fact, one species with multiple cultures (programs) – not races or species-like subgroups (with different essential hardware).

 

Our developmental task as a species, especially in the United States, is then to move to discovering the group differences that are culturally based and distinguishing those from individual aptitudes that vary between members of groups.  Ackerman points out that bird species also have intergroup differences.  There are, in effect, personalities for individual birds within a species.  And these differences are essential for the survival of species, including our own.

 

When I was first teaching about the brain to students in an Intro to Psychology class, I was at a big state school with a big medical and veterinary school.  Most of us used a real human brain in the classroom, but one of my enterprising peers borrowed a horse brain and a cat brain and a lizard brain to demonstrate to the class how the brain evolved.  Of course all of these brains were preserved in formaldehyde, so there was a powerful smell in the room.  When the instructor pranked the students by musing that some people treated brains as a delicacy and then reached down to pick up a piece of cauliflower and bite into it with a resounding crunch, she was unprepared for the student in the second row to throw up.  That was the last time she went to such lengths to prepare for that class!

 

Bird brains are smaller even than cat and squirrel brains and comparing any individual capacities of birds with mammals is kind of cruel, but when, as Ackerman does, you compare what birds are able to accomplish as a species, it is possible to appreciate both the tremendous plasticity of the brain and the tremendous variety of adaptations that a class of species can make in order to survive – but also to thrive. 

 

Sparrows, the most ubiquitous birds on the planet – appear to have two strains of personality in their genetic pool.  Some sparrows are thrill seekers.  They try new things and are good at testing out all kinds of new tastes when the species comes in contact with a new environment.  Other sparrows are more conservative.  They tend to stick with the tried and true.  The conservative sparrows are much less likely to push into new territory – they tend to stay where the risk takers have taken the flock while the risk takers move on – and the risk takers die at a higher rate because they are willing to try things that are poisonous, which the conservatives learn from – and learn to stay with what works.

 

Some birds are, objectively, really stupid.  The Dodo was apparently one of these and this led to its demise.  The stupider birds seem to have found an ecological niche, like the conservative sparrows, and they are well adapted to that niche, but when things change, they are not likely to do well.  In fact, they are much more likely to become extinct – and are becoming extinct at higher rates as we upend habitat after habitat.  But there are birds, like the crows, that are able to adapt in part because they are good problem solvers – they can even use tools – something that we used to think was the sole provenance of the ape family, including humans.

 

The interesting thing about the problem solvers is that they are best at solving problems not when things are topsy turvy – and problem solving would seem to be most in need – but at times and in places that are quite stable.  In these places, the young can be quite young for a very long time and learn from the elder birds and, when they do, they learn problem solving skills which they can then adapt to new uses.  They learn how to make different tools, for instance, and then are able to apply them in novel ways as adults.  This mirrors our own system of prolonging adolescence by supporting our kids as they go through college and beyond - to graduate or professional school.

 

Tool maker’s brains are organized very differently than the migrants.  Migrants focus on navigation and have much of their brain space dedicated to the ability to get from one place to another.  They have the ability to map – something that cognitive psychologists were first able to demonstrate with rats, something that started the cognitive revolution away from pure behaviorism.  Yes, psychology, the mind is an important thing to study!  But migrants are not tool users – and they aren’t singers – at least not of the same ability as the mockingbirds and the parrots.  They don't have the space to do both.  Pigeons, not noted for their brilliance are, in fact, quite able to navigate.

 

Some big brain birds – the crows – can both solve problems and warble in intriguing ways.  Unfortunately, they aren’t beautiful animals.  Ackerman speculates that they may be the best suited to survive, though the birds that are smartest do not have the most offspring.  There is a tradeoff.  She ends her book quoting Einstein that humans have just enough intelligence to see how inadequate our intelligence is when we are confronted with what is.  While I agree with this, I was wishing, this morning, as I was working in the garden or, more accurately, hacking back the jungle that is emerging in my yard and the cracks in my sidewalk, trying to reclaim the wildness of the world – I found myself wishing that the animals knew enough to know, collectively, what a threat we are and that they, like the small birds in our neighborhood who gang up on the hawks who are dining on them, would gang up on us.


You may also be interested in a post: The Overstory which is a fascinating (indeed Pullitzer Prize winning) novel about trees and the people who love (and hug) them.  If you were interested in the minds part, you may find this post about the ways that Freud's ideas are informing neurology interesting.

 

To access a narrative description of other posts on this site, link here.  For a subject based index, link here. 






To subscribe to posts (which occur 2-3 times per month), just enter your email in the subscribe by email box to the right of the text.



No comments:

Post a Comment

The Covenant of Water: Is it a Great Book?

 Covenant of Water, Abraham Verghese, Psychoanalysis, Psychology, Diversity, Quality Is The Covenant of Water a Great Book?   Abraham Vergh...