Total Pageviews

Sunday, February 6, 2022

Belfast and The Tender Bar: Memoir can hit home differently when it is grounded in love.

Movie Belfast; Movie Tender Bar; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Memoir; Kenneth Branagh





We watched The Tender Bar, a film directed by George Clooney, a week ago and then watched Belfast, a film written and directed by Kenneth Branagh, this week.  I was struck by the similarities between them: both are films based in memoir; each includes terribly well-acted experiences that occur around and within a boy in the late 1960s/early 1970s (JR (Daniel Ranieri) on Long Island and Buddy (Jude Hill) in Belfast); each boy grows up to be an artist; both boys have a longing for an absent father that is capably filled by family members – a grandfather and, to a lesser extent, a grandmother in each, and JR’s uncle in The Tender Bar; and they are both well-crafted movies following a well-trod path eerily echoing each other.

While both were satisfying movie watching experiences, Belfast had an emotional impact that was seismically more profound than that of The Tender Bar; I was taken aback by the unexpected power of the film, even as I was watching it.  Why, I wondered, is this film affecting me in this way?  Especially because I found myself being critical of it in advance of seeing it and also as it unfolded, how could I be so moved by it?


Both movies are disorienting.  You don’t quite know who is who in the beginning of each.  The voiceover in the Tender Bar introduces the characters and their relationships, but something about the chaotic nature of them – and I think also that Ben Affleck, playing the part of Uncle Charlie Maguire, seemed too clean cut to be as seedy as the character seemed to need to be – and that his performance was such a close reprise of his role in Good Will Hunting that The Tender Bar felt more like a variation on a theme or perhaps déjà vu with prodigious language skills as a substitute for math skills, that it left me a bit disoriented.

Belfast; however – a film about which I only knew that it was a memoir of Kenneth Branagh’s childhood – took my breath away in the opening scene and never quite gave it back.  I came into the film expecting to learn how a great light of the English Stage and Screen learned his craft.  I left with that, but not at all in the way I expected to receive it.

I have always secretly hated Branagh.  I think mostly out of envy.  Why does he have all this talent?  How come he gets to strut and preen on the stage and screen?  It’s ugly of me, I know, but there’s the truth.  Especially when I saw him in the remake of The Orient Express, a film he directed and starred in; the grandiosity of his character seemed to reflect the personal grandiosity that I had sensed emanating from him in perhaps all of his films including his uncut Hamlet (though I won’t rule out the possibility that I projected it onto him).  This is also tinged by my entirely naïve fear that he imagined himself too pretty for Emma Thompson (and I will state that this is completely a projection on my part).

So, I was well prepared to dislike this film, and dislike it I did at the git go.  Naïve not just to Branaugh, I was naïve to Belfast as a historical place.  When the camera jumped the wall from present day Belfast – a small port city with shipbuilding capacity, a modest but clearly modern skyline, with a certain gritty but likeable exterior to the Belfast of the late 1960s, portrayed in black and white, with streets so clean they had to be a movie set and an idyllic neighborhood where everyone knew each other and was looking out for each other, I thought, “Here we go, this feels like we’re in the cleaned up New York of the original West Side Story and Officer Krupke is just around the corner…”

What was just around the corner, of course, was harrowing.  The Troubles emerge and spoil the idyll.  And the tension in the film revolves around the ways in which the family is torn by its attachment to the Belfast they have grown up in – articulated most clearly by the boy’s mother Ma (Caitríona Balfe) and by Buddy himself – and by the wish to get the hell out – articulated by the boy’s father, Pa (Jamie Dornan)  who works in England and comes home only every other weekend and us – the audience – who fear for Buddy’s (and everybody else’s) life.

One of the differences between the two films is the personality of the boy at the center of it all.  Each boy has a close relationship with his mother – and, in the absence of the father (the boy in The Tender Bar’s father is The Voice on your AM dial, calling out the hits on various New York Radio Stations which JR listens to on his radio at roughly the same time that Buddy is in Belfast listening to orders from police through megaphones), each boy gets wisdom, including and especially about women, from a relative. 

It is not clear what JR does with the wisdom he gleans.  Unlike in Belfast, we get to see him operate as young man (played by Tye Sheridan).  Here he can take the weary worldly wise attitude of uncle Charlie and direct it at the parents of the girlfriend who has just jilted him in her family home – and he dismisses her parents as cruelly as she has just dismissed him.  But he, like his uncle, can’t seem to take his own advice and stays stuck in adoring an inconstant lover – a lover as inconstant as his father has been.  His task – the coming of age that he must achieve – is to harness the powers of observation that his younger self used to create stories and pursue his art (writing), rather than to pursue a career (writing) that will impress his lover.

Let me explain the last sentence in the last paragraph.  One of my dear friends from childhood, the drummer in the band that I played with in High School, is a professional musician.  When he and I met recently for lunch, we talked and I was impressed with his success (trust me, it is remarkable).  He was lamenting, though, being a professional musician.  He writes and performs music to meet other’s needs and he is handsomely paid for doing that.  But he is also not free.  He envies the busker who opens his guitar case, plays his songs for whatever people will pay, and plays whatever he chooses.  What he told me was that guy – the busker – declares himself an artist.  He said, “I, on the other hand, write and play what people tell me too.”

Now, don’t get me wrong.  The author of the book from which the movie was made (JR Moehringer) has to create stories that his agent and his editor believe will sell (and, I just discovered, he has earned a Pullitzer for his reporting – so the wish to be an artist rather than a professional is apparently an unachieved dream).  And my friend plays – and plays with – and creates – music.  He is an artist.  But the freedom of coming of age – the sense of owning one’s own destiny (rather than being constantly in debt to bookies, as Uncle Charlie is, and forever in love with an unloving paramour, as JR appears to escape from) is the hoped for experience of this movie.

The theme of Belfast, though, is sad rather than hopeful.  While Buddy’s Pa tries to lure Ma to take the family to Nova Scotia or Perth, Buddy overhears them and processes what he hears with his grandfather.  Unlike Uncle Charlie’s scattershot advice about managing women, Buddy’s grandpa has an endearingly romantic notion of what it means to be in love, and he enacts this with his wife (played fetchingly by Dame Judith Dench), Pa enacts it with Ma, and Protestant Buddy enacts it in his achingly earnest courtship of Catherine, the Catholic girl for whom he tries to master maths so as to be able to earn the seat across from her.  To achieve freedom, but more importantly safety, Buddy (and Pa and Ma and his older brother) must leave behind much that they love.  

The relationships in Belfast are built on more solid foundations than those depicted in The Tender Bar.  The protagonists in each movie make use of what they are given as a launching pad that propels them far.  Each takes their own character (Buddy, unlike JR, is not primarily an observer – he acts – meaning that he emulates his father’s drive to more actively chart the arc of his life (including by getting caught up in the troubles in his own 9 year old way) and we know this will take him far and to a place that is consonant with who they are as people.

Perhaps in my harsh judgement of Branagh, I am emulating JR.  Invited into Branagh’s home and feeling jilted by my envy of his talent and opportunities, I have chosen to devalue them as JR devalued his girlfriend’s home.  Perhaps Branagh’s skill and opportunity rests on a solid foundation that, no matter how idealized it may be in the rosy hues of hindsight, provides him with the pluck of the truly joyful kid whose life has been tempered by learning, all too early, how dear and fragile that joy is and how dependent it is on loving the people in your life.  His action, sharing that love with actors on screen - and therefore with those of us who connect with him (when we aren't feeling too much envy), connects us to something essential about who it is that he is - something that all the ugliness of The Troubles and the complications of the roles he has played on stage and screen, and also in life, cannot shake out of him.    


   To access a narrative description of other posts on this site, link here.  For a subject based index, link here. 


To subscribe to posts (which occur 2-3 times per month), please try using the service at the top of the page.  I have had difficulty with these and am looking for something better, but these are what I have at this moment. 

    

No comments:

Post a Comment

Go Tell It on the Mountain: James Baldwin’s Coming of Age roman a clef that Comes together in One Day.

 Go Tell it on the Mountain, James Baldwin, Psychology, Psychoanalysis, Civil Rights, Personal Narrative, Power of the Concrete When I was...