Total Pageviews

Tuesday, July 5, 2022

Severance - Work and Life Bisected

 Apple TV+ Series Severance Psychology Psychoanalysis Meaning of Work and Work Life Balance




What if you could not remember the color of your mother’s eyes?  Or any other details about her?  What if you could not remember your own name, or anything about your life outside of work? 

The creators of Severance, a gripping new series streaming on Apple TV+ asks us to grapple with the impact of this experience – and in so doing, they expose multiple fault lines in our actual work/life balance, while simultaneously making a powerful political statement.

Interestingly, in a series that severs its players from the rest of their lives, it evokes many, many other series and films – as if it were offering homages to them or perhaps appropriating them while having a look and feel that is also very much its very own. 

It feels like a David Lynch film, but the eeriness in this is not that like what David Lynch provides - images an unprocessed dream – a dream where the symbols are left without any referents (except maybe the baby goats); instead the vision is that there is a sense that there is an underlying order that the writers and directors want to help us understand.  Furthermore there is a sense that, in so far as chaos lies very near to what is being described, that chaos is the chaos that we all are in contact with and trying (perhaps desperately) to keep at bay, and the writers and directors are as afraid of it as we are, not in league with it, the way that David Lynch sometimes appears to be. 


Using the Bell Labs office building designed by Eero Saarinan as the setting for Lumon Industries puts us in an interesting space/time dimension.  Futuristic when it opened in 1962, the building still feels futuristic and therefore vaguely impersonal, like the sets of the film 2001 A Space Odyssey.  Like Bell Labs, which was tremendously successful, breeding Nobel prizes and products like cell phones that would be tremendously successful and profitable, the venture was doomed – as we hope that Lumon industries will be, too.  We strongly suspect that the attractiveness of the above ground facility hides a cancerous underground menace.

The actual office layout that the severed workers descend to under the modern edifice feels even more blatantly anachronistically futuristic, with its lavish use of space, outdated and slightly mod but off colors, fluorescent lighting, 1980s computer consoles and graphics, and rat maze hallways that create a sense of claustrophobia - a sense that we are trapped in a space that is essentially hostile to our existence as organic creatures – not something that is supportive to human life.

The people who inhabit this space that seems akin to the space in the movie Office Space, people who have been severed from the rest of their lives, including memories of their mothers and fathers and siblings and children, live lives that are centered on their work experience.  Even though they have no memory of who they are on the outside (their outies), the innies are not children playing together in a play space, but fully formed adults – adults who “remember” how to have a personality, even if they don’t have the memory of how that personality was formed.

The relationships between these “innies” is reminiscent of our work relationships.  They are half-formed.  There are work parties that feel forced and odd and are fun, kind of.  Kind of the way my work parties feel.  People don’t expose themselves at work parties the way they exposed themselves at birthday parties when they were two or four or six, nor in the ways they exposed themselves at peer parties when they were 16 or 18 or 20.  These are fully formed adults who know how to protect their secrets, even though they themselves don’t have access to them even when they want to.

The mechanism behind this is a chip that is inserted in the brain and we watch the outies transition to innies in the morning, after they change into their work clothes at their lockers and after they are checked to make sure they are not taking contraband down to their work station.  They close their eyes and we can see their outie persona melt away as they return to their work environment in what seems to their innie to have been only a moment. 

Of course, when I return to work, it is as if I never left, but that is because I have been worrying about it all night – sometimes quite literally.  What have I forgotten to do?  How can I understand this thing that is at a tight spot in this therapy?  How can I work out how best to teach this concept?  Or deal with this administrator?  It is as if I never leave…

The work that the innies do is odd.  The work of those we follow most closely, in the “Macrodata Refinement” department, sort numbers into bins based on an intuitive feel for those numbers.  What they are really doing is anyone’s guess.  It seems quite odd, but there are quotas and rewards for work well done.  There are also promotions – we join Mark S. (Adam Scott) on his first day as the leader of the four person department on the day after his best innie friend Petey (Yul Vazquez) leaves the work for reasons unknown.  He inducts a new innie, Helly R. (Britt Lower) in the first episode into the organization to replace Petey and join Dylan (Zach Cherry) and Irving (John Turturro) to complete the department.  The department is overseen by the menacing Harmony (Patricia Arquette) and her henchman, Seth Milchick (Tramell Tillman). 

While the work they are doing is mysterious – and there may be meaning to it that will be revealed in later seasons – their primary role, in the first season, seems to be being severed workers.  Their true job is to prove to a skeptical world that the amnestic work world is productive and acceptable – perhaps even useful.  As an aid in this endeavor – since it is we, the audience, who need the most convincing, we follow Mark S. as he transforms into his outie Mark Scout and discover that he is a grieving history professor who lost his job when he could no longer concentrate in the wake of his wife’s death.  He chose to sever his work life in part because he couldn’t find other work, but mostly as a means of making a third of his life – if not unbearable, at least off limits. 

We empathize with Mark Scout.  Not only is he grieving, his sister is married to a complete idiot who is so narcissistically involved that he doesn’t realize that his self-published self-help book is a complete waste of time, as are his pompous and clueless friends.  Mark is so depleted, though, that he relies on his sister, her social life, and alcohol to simply survive one day after another.  He seems genuinely relieved that he has no access to his work life, for it would surely complicate the rest of his life, and he is already failing to manage the minimal complications that this life presents.

Our complacency does not last long; however.  We see how shallow and lifeless the work of the innies is and we detest Lumon, the corporation that would pit them against each other – in this case, using the myth that the “Optics and Design” department attacked the Macrodata Refinement department in a failed coup years ago.  Irving, the most loyal of to the organization of the Macordata Refinement deparment – the person who can cite chapter and verse from the Lumos Bible – is attracted to Burt (Christopher Walken) in O&D.  This leads the group to bond over fighting to connect with the other severed workers against Harmony and Milchick and ultimately the entire weight of the Lumos Corporation.


So, this series, like Office Space and The Truman Show, becomes a story of man against corporate America.  The Macrodata Refinement department begin swashbuckling like superheroes, and the chinks in the corporate armor emerge, as does the stench from the lies and moral compromises that support it.  All of this is ripe for interpretation: Why would we become subservient to a corporate master?  Perhaps more chillingly current, why would be become subservient to a dictatorial government?  But I would like to focus on a different aspect – how is it that we relate to our work selves?

The metaphoric space allows for the depiction of two parts of ourself – the “real” self and the work self.  Helly R. (as her work self), during her first day of work, appeals to her outie (her real self) to free her from the dismal and abusive workplace.  Her outie, through a recorded message, refuses her request and encourages her to continue on doing the work.  And don’t we do this to ourselves – we fail to empathize with just how difficult the work is for us to do – as we drag ourselves out of bed to return to the work – and linger in the evenings (perhaps binge-watching Severance) to extend the time of our freedom – even if that will make it harder to get up in the morning?  Isn’t the hope of releasing ourselves from this miserable cycle part of what lies behind the Great Resignation?

From the view of this metaphoric space, though, we not only fail to empathize, we disown and despise – indeed we might even feel disdain for – our working selves.  They do stuff that is not worth doing and they do it in a hermetically sealed environment that is severed from our “real” lives.  Even though our “real” lives may be bleak, or shallow, or filled with pain, they are real and this allows us to value them more highly than our work selves.  Certainly, our partners or our children can do this – I despised my father’s work – I devalued it – and did not want to emulate his life – one of apparent drudgery where he went off to provide for us.  He also seemed to resent it – complaining that we constantly demanded more stuff so that he was forced to work harder – but I think I questioned whether he was actually working for us or whether he was more drawn to the work than to being with us.  Perhaps our shared disdain was directed towards his love of working (and my wish to avoid emulating him was a way of acknowledging that I, too, could be drawn into that seemingly hateful but apparently very attractive vortex).

All of this gets encapsulated in the ways that work becomes a sort of religion for us.  It is what gives our lives meaning.  We are accomplishing something at work that helps us matter.  When Helly R. finishes an assignment, the 1870s founder of Lumos, Kier Egan (voiced by director Ben Stiller), visits Helly, in one of those cheesy 1980s video representations, as a bird who lets her know that she is loved by him before he flies off to give good wishes to other Lumos workers.  Helly and the other three members of the department stare at him with rapt attention.  They have been visited by the founder!

This, of course, would allow us to enter the series as a commentary on religion, which I think it is, but if we stay in the work/life vein, we can see that it is commenting that work has taken on the role of religion in our lives.  It provides a sense of purpose, of being part of something greater, and of contributing to something that will live on after us – the corporate – the embodied – being that is representative of us collectively and individually.

Of course there are problems with this formulation, but the central problem is that we are going to die no matter what we do.  Being angry at ourselves for having wasted the better parts of our lives is a way of managing the anger that we feel about having been given this tremendous gift of life, but with the caveat that we only get to enjoy it for a limited and indeterminant amount of time. 

Poignantly, when a Lumon employee is fired, quits, or retires, they disappear.  When they go up that elevator for the last time, their work lives and all that life contained (in the case of Burt, his love for Irving) disappears.  As I approach my retirement(s) (one from teaching at the University, the other from clinical practice) the question of how to bring a career (I never wanted to have a career) to a close is a complicated one.  What will happen to the work relationships – the relationships with other faculty and staff, with students, and with patients?  I have friendships with fellow faculty and staff that I trust will survive.  I expect that we will, ironically, largely talk about our families.  Will we continue to care about the issues that have fueled our professional lives?  How can we not?  How can we continue to?  Will the work of our lives die with our retirement?

My mother has recently put all of the old family movies, slides and photos into electronic form.  This is a tremendous gift.  I can remember – or remember for the first time – moments of intimacy with my grandfather, who died when I was youngster but whom I have carried with me through my entire life.  I can see interactions with and between my family members with new eyes.  I have memories, but they are from my perspective – not through the objective lens of the camera.  What will be the record of my work life?  My resume – or, as we call it in academia – my curriculum vita?  What kind of record is that?

The grim view presented in this gripping series is that we will have no relevant memories of our working lives.  We will struggle to integrate our work life with our personal life – and perhaps in coming seasons we will see whether this is a triumphant vision or a more tragic one.  I think it should be clear by now that I believe the tragic vision is not written into the bylaws of the corporation, but into the very joints of the natural world.  It is our task to knit together an existence that, what?  Allows us to traverse the span our existence with some sense of style and grace – to join with others in a revolution against something that is inevitable, but also cruel, and to try to wring some sense of joy and genuine purpose out of a life that is replete with the eerie specters that would pass as providing real meaning.

I fear that I am leaving those of you who haven't seen it with a bad impression of this series.  It is gripping theater.  The striving against the oppressive corporate forces leads to a tremendous denouement that I don't want to spoil for you - and one that is open enough for us to sit on our seats for a season and wait for it's resolution when the next season drops.  In the meantime we will continue to toil, in our own disparate ways, to fight off the oppressors!  Good luck to us all as we do.

 

 To access a narrative description of other posts on this site, link here.  For a subject based index, link here. 


To subscribe to posts (which occur 2-3 times per month), please try using the service at the top of the page.  I have had difficulty with these and am looking for something better, but these are what I have at this moment. 


  

No comments:

Post a Comment

The Covenant of Water: Is it a Great Book?

 Covenant of Water, Abraham Verghese, Psychoanalysis, Psychology, Diversity, Quality Is The Covenant of Water a Great Book?   Abraham Vergh...