Total Pageviews

Tuesday, July 21, 2020

More Covid Paranoia – Why Shutting Higher Education Makes Good Fiscal Sense


 

What we don’t know about COVID-19 is staggering.  But the models that we have from former viral infection agents is worrisome, to say the least.  If this is like HIV or Herpes, this could become a lifetime illness that will reoccur at, for instance, times of stress.  If like Herpes, it will become transmittable when it is reactivated, we will need to be guarding against this for a long time – or until we have a reliable vaccine.  If you don’t like wearing a mask now, imagine how you will feel wearing one forever – or intermittently whenever you begin to appear symptomatic. 

 

But that is just the surface problem.  The long term problem could be that we would have dangerous – perhaps even life threatening re-occurrences as we age.  These would need to be treated medically.  And, not only would that be personally dangerous and interfere with our ability to do our jobs intermittently, the medical care will be expensive. 

 

The Universities, it is becoming clear, are reopening this fall because of economic concerns.  Elsewhere I have shown how, for my University, these concerns are related to the importance and value of teaching in person – something that we have been devaluing in trying to compete with other universities to offer lower tuitions.  So we have been backed ourselves into an economic corner where we need to have kids in the classroom in order to break even financially.

 

My concern is that this may be penny wise and pound foolish.  By keeping ourselves afloat, we will create a petri dish for COVID to infect more students, who have gathered from all over country in dorms that are every bit as confined as cruise ships, and the students, as they share the virus amongst themselves, may infect faculty and staff.  Many of our faculty are tenured and most of them eventually will be.  This means they have lifetime contracts with the University.  Our University’s health plan is a self-insurance plan.  That means we pay for the treatments that those we cover need.

 

If COVID becomes a recurring, lifetime illness, we will be paying for treatments for a very long time.  How long can we afford to do that?  How much will we have to raise tuition to do that?  How long will people be able to afford that tuition?  Is this a recipe for long term economic collapse of the University?

 

So, you may say, who cares?  Don’t we have enough Universities?  I think the bigger issue is that opening up our economy before we have a solution to a health threat that we don’t understand means that we are playing Russian roulette not just at the level of the University, but at the level of state and National economies.  Someone is going to have to pay the bills for the long term health care (if COVID recurs) and that someone is going to be all of us.

 

If we are saddling ourselves with a long-term health crisis that will sap our economic strength for a generation in order to prevent short term difficulties, what will that look like in five or ten years?  Wouldn’t it be prudent to slow things down, err on the side of safety, protect our health, and protect our long term economic interests by figuring out how to survive short-term economic difficulties?  In the meantime, we should be social distancing, washing our hands and wearing masks – to protect each other’s health and our long term economic well-being.

 

Ultimately we are not the lone individual in the wilderness fighting to create our own, personal destiny and outcome.  We are a community of people that depend on each other.  We need to act like that.

To access a narrative description of other posts on this site, link here.  For a subject based index, link here. 

To subscribe to posts (which occur 2-3 times per month), just enter your email in the subscribe by email box to the right of the text.


For other posts on COVID:
I:       Apocalypse Now  my first posting on COVID-19.
II:      Midnight in Paris  is a jumping off point for more thinking about COVID.  (Also in Movies).
III:    Hans Selye and the Stress Response Syndrome.  COVID becomes more normal... for now.
VI:    Get back in that classroom  Paranoid ruminations.
VII:   Why Shutting Classes Makes Fiscal Sense A weak argument
XIII: Ennui
XIV. Where, Oh Where have my in-person students gone?  Split zoom classes in the age of COVID.
XVIII.    I miss my mask?
IXX.      Bo Burnham's Inside Commentary on the commenter.


2 comments:

  1. You are spot on in your analysis. I would add that the short-sightedness about getting back to the hybrid, masked and disinfected classroom deprives us of the chance to really revision what the future of higher education should look like. We have (had?) an opportunity to create a future, but chose instead to rearrange the past.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am curious about your vision... What does the future of higher education look like?

    ReplyDelete

Blessing America First: David Buckley’s take on the first Trump State Department transition

 Trump, Populism, Psychoanalysis, Religion, Foreign Policy, Psychology Our local Association for Psychoanalytic Thought (Apt) was thinking...